Sunday 2 June 2019

The Sino-US Trade War and Onset of Interest Rate cuts

The Sino-US Trade War – Where will it lead to?

What started as a showcase of cheap cost manufacturing base by China, luring the transnational companies to set up global scale manufacturing bases in China for mass production to suit every nation’s consumption requirements, in the decades of 1990, 2000 and 2010, with the help of huge FDIs coming in from the world’s largest economy, turned out to be a dragon trying to overshadow, outgrow and giving tough competition to the largest economy of the world, i.e., the US.

If we make an attempt to analyse and compare the two economies, i.e., the US and the Chinese, the US has an exceptionally strong currency, which helps boost consumption of imported goods, a strong ecosystem encouraging R&D, innovation and attracting talent pool from across the globe, a capitalist set up, which encourages entrepreneurship, as its key strong points amongst many others.

Contrasting that is the Chinese economy with a formidable unparalleled manufacturing base (not easily replicable by a competing country in a short span of time), a huge population to boost domestic consumption and a wide client base (countries to which China exports), a world class infrastructure which challenges that of the US, a communist government with intent and designs of territorial expansions (merely by claims and deployment of force), control over the natural resources and key strategic locations of the South East Asian nations.

With the gap between the incremental GDP of the two countries narrowing down fast; China becoming an increasingly superior technological and cyber power and a clutch of Chinese companies supplying future generation telecom equipment and mobile handsets globally with espionage capabilities; China building OBOR, threatening the sovereignty of the countries of the Indian subcontinent; having dominant presence of its naval fleet in the Indian Ocean/ South China Sea, challenging and threatening geopolitical stability in these regions, it becomes imperative for the US to curb the dominance of China or the Chinese companies actively engaged in such activities and take measures that put a check on China’s economic and cyber prowess and also its territorial expansionary tendencies. The US thinks so.

The trade war which was initiated by the US in Jan 2018 primarily against China has not seen any signs of abatement, rather on the contrary has only been exacerbated by the warring nations. The hubris of the nations to prove dominance or not to show any signs of weakness has led the two nations to go ahead with firing the ammunition in their respective arsenals with no signs or intentions by either one to blink first.

The trade war proxy seems to be the most visible sign of ego of the two nations without leading them anywhere in achieving their visible or ulterior motives. Perhaps this was the only form of war that could have been engaged in. The two nations are engaged in causing self-inflicting wounds, with the intention to hurt the other.

The latest salvo fired by the Chinese Premier is the hint of restricting/ suspending the exports of rare earth metals to USA, which find applications in US defence industry and wide range of economic activities. China has 40% of the world reserves and contributes to 70% of the global production. USA sources 80% of its rare earth metals requirement from China.

It is a widely accepted norm that China doesn’t throw a hint without a follow-up action. This indicates that it will take some time before USA could be able to meet its total requirements from sources other than China.

For a few dollars more

Microsoft is now the most valuable company of the world with the distinction of entering the trillion dollar club for just a day and giving company to Apple and Amazon. The share price of the company kept hovering just a few dollars below the rate (approx. US$ 130.5/ share) where it entered the trillion dollar mark market cap just for a day but still continues to be the most valuable company since then, ahead of Apple and Amazon.

A tribute to a karma Yogi of India

This post would not be complete without a tribute to Yogi Deveshwar, Padma Bhushan, whom India lost in the din and cacophony during the recently concluded elections in India. A true karma Yogi, he took helm of the operations of ITC in 1996 and transformed its image from being a tobacco company to that of multinational conglomerate with a strong flavour of FMCG. Yogi was the longest serving CEO of any Indian company till the time of his departure. Yogi also held many other coveted posts in various other institutions.

The company’s e-Choupal initiative finds its mention in the bestselling book, “Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid,” authored by Strategy Guru, C K Prahlad.

Despite the churn which keeps happening in the list of India’s most valuable companies, ITC consistently appeared in the list of top 10 companies for decades under Yogi’s able leadership.

RIP Yogi.

US Fed interest rates

In the recently released minutes of the last held Federal Reserve policy meet, the Fed has pledged continued patience and commitment to stable rates/ no rates hike regime. Fed has on many occasions given reasonable indications of easing monetary policy in future in case the US economy faces head winds.

RBI’s upcoming monetary policy announcement in first week of June 2019

With a stable government in place and visible signs of a global slowdown it is a widely formed opinion that the RBI is expected to announce a rate cut in the forthcoming policy meeting in the first week of June.

Nifty, Indices and Stocks

In light of the formation of a stable government at the centre, by a party with an absolute majority, many financial analysts are of the opinion that Nifty may see and upside of 10-15% from the current levels in the immediate future. While the long term trend of growth of the Indian economy remains intact, the following charts indicate a near term correction in Nifty.

Also given are the charts of a few other indices and stocks which indicate that the ensuing correction is expected to be a global phenomenon not linked to a particular region, country or event.

NIFTY





DOW

NASDAQ 100



APPLE


AMAZON


MICROSOFT


But the question that I keep asking myself and which remains unaddressed in my mind is this: “If the Sino-US trade war comes to an abrupt end, will the global indices scale back to their previous highs and not correct further?”

For more charts the author can be contacted at: riskadvisory@outlook.com.


DISCLAIMER:

These extracts from my trading worksheets/books are for the purpose of education only. Any advice contained therein is provided for the general information of readers and does not have regard to any particular person's investment objectives, financial situation or needs and must not be construed as an advice to buy, hold and sell or otherwise deal/ trade in commodities, currencies, indices, securities or other forms of investments. Accordingly, no reader should act on the basis of any information contained therein without consulting a suitably qualified financial advisor in the first place.

No comments:

Post a Comment